
Decision authority
Clear records of who had the right to decide or deploy, distinct from advice, review, or implementation.
Verifiable records of authority, judgement, and risk acceptance — captured at the moment decisions are exercised and preserved for audits, investigations, discovery, litigation, and years-later review.
We don’t help organisations decide what’s compliant — we preserve evidence so decisions can be defended later.
Built for US boards, public bodies, universities, healthcare systems, and regulated organisations operating under enforcement, procurement, and liability pressure.
Under enforcement, audit, or litigation, the question is rarely whether policies existed. It is whether judgement can still be defended on the record after the fact.
Where those answers have to be reconstructed, hindsight fills the gaps. That’s where otherwise credible governance quietly fails.
Veriscopic does not provide legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. It produces durable evidence showing how authority, judgement, and reliance were exercised — so those decisions can be examined and defended if challenged.

Clear records of who had the right to decide or deploy, distinct from advice, review, or implementation.

Evidence anchored to the moment decisions were exercised — not reconstructed after scrutiny begins.

Logs, artefacts, and records preserved in forms that survive staff turnover, vendor change, and litigation and retention timelines.
Consent is often treated as a configuration problem. Under scrutiny, it becomes an evidence problem.
Veriscopic captures consent and reliance as time-fixed events — preserving what was shown, what was agreed, when it occurred, under which policy, and how that record has been maintained since.
Those records can be exported as verifiable PDFs, suitable for audit, investigation, or discovery, without interpretation or explanation.
View consent evidence example →We explain this shift in more detail on why Veriscopic exists and throughout our Insights.
Portable, immutable records that show how governance operated in practice — designed to be shared with auditors, regulators, insurers, and legal counsel without narrative reconstruction.
A short, exploratory conversation for trustees and senior leaders who want to understand how governance evidence works in practice.